03:45 pm, Friday 29 June, 2007
Fairfax
A Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) inspector has admitted the aviation watchdog’s response to concerns about the airline at the centre of one of the nation’s worst air disasters was “unsatisfactory”.
Brisbane-based CASA inspector Max McRae today gave evidence to a coronial inquest into the circumstances surrounding the Lockhart River plane crash on May 7, 2005.
All 15 people aboard died when the TransAir-operated Metroliner aircraft ploughed into a 500-metre high mountain on approach to the Lockhart River Aboriginal community on Cape York, in far north Queensland.
Following a two-year investigation into the crash, the Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) found, among other contributors, CASA failed to detect and regulate safety problems inherent in TransAir.
The report showed CASA raised concerns with the now-defunct TransAir as early as 1998 about its director Les Wright, who was also the airline’s CEO, chief pilot and training and checking pilot.
The aviation body was concerned Mr Wright was “spread very thin” across the Australian and Papua New Guinea operations, compromising safety.
A 1999 CASA audit of TransAir uncovered a worrying degree of non-compliance, including inadequate management and issues relating to the airlines’ operations manual.
The audit results prompted CASA to draft a show-cause notice against Mr Wright demanding why he should be allowed to keep his chief pilot approval, which if stripped would have effectively grounded the airline.
But the notice was not issued because Mr Wright agreed to an urgent alternative course of action which included appointing someone to introduce and manage a safety management system within the company.
It was agreed Mr Wright would provide CASA with weekly reports and attend meetings to ensure progress was being made.
However, the ATSB found CASA files showed little evidence TransAir complied with the agreement.
TransAir only appointed a safety manager in 2001 and a deputy chief pilot a year later.
Under cross examination, Mr McRae today was asked why CASA allowed TransAir to expand its operations to include additional routes while it deemed the airline, which hadn’t kept its end of the agreement, “high risk”.
“CASA was in a position where we were trying to improve the organisation,” Mr McRae said.
When asked if these concerns weren’t “followed through”, Mr McRae replied: “Yes”.
When further asked if this was unsatisfactory, he responded: “In those terms, yes”.
He said CASA had embarked on “a lot more operational surveillance” following the crash, but the onus was on the airline operators to do the right thing.
When asked what he believed was the cause of the accident, he responded: “I believe the guy flew into the hill”.
“I don’t think one can form an absolute view,” he said.
Report by
Julia Alder - Do you have an OHS News Story -
Let us know