03:28 pm, Monday 24 May, 2010
A recycling company has been fined $50,000 last week over an industrial accident involving a 15-year-old employee.
The Midland Magistrates Court found the company guilty to failing to provide a safe workplace and causing serious harm to a worker.
The incident took place at the Midland company’s worksite in September 2006, where the young worker was using a baling machine.
The machine works by placing plastic product through the input door into a large metal box. The machine’s hydraulic ram then compresses and bales the product, where it comes out through the output door.
The hydraulic ram will not run unless the input door is closed. However, the ram will still eject bales when the output door is open.
Another door at the side of the equipment can be opened, allowing workers to strap bales. The ram can operate while the side door is open, and it cannot be fully closed until the bale is ejected through the output door.
The company’s workers had been trained to close the side door as far as possible after strapping the bale. Once the bale was ejected, the workers were instructed to close the door fully before retracting the ram.
On the day of the accident, another worker was at the output door extracting a completed bale.
The worker who was injured was situated by the open side door while the ram was retracted.
As the ram retracted past the side door, the young man’s right foot was crushed between the ram and the edge of the metal box’s.
As a result, the worker had to undergo surgery to have his two middle toes amputated.
According to WorkSafe WA Commissioner Nina Lyhne, the case shows the dangers of having inadequately guarded machinery and not implementing safe work practices.
“Anyone in control of a workplace containing machinery with hazardous moving parts needs to ensure that those moving parts are safely guarded,” Ms Lyhne said.
“Guarding of the moving parts of machinery is still one of the easiest and most obvious means of minimising the risk of injury to machinery operators, and I strongly urge employers in workplaces with machinery to ensure that it is safe to operate.
“It is also up to the employer to ensure that workers observe the safe work practices that are in place. However in this case, it would have been better to ensure that the machine was safe to operate in the first place.
“After this incident, the machine was fitted with an interlock switch – similar to those on the input and output doors – to prevent the ram from retracting when the side door was open but still allowing it to move forward to eject a bale.
“This modification only cost around $1700, and could have prevented the worker from losing two toes if it had been done earlier.”
Report by
Julia Alder - Do you have an OHS News Story -
Let us know